Truth or Consequences?

Bush Court to Decide if EPA or God

Will Regulate Global Warming

Science seems to pose an extremely vexacious area of study to President Bush and his acolytes. Golly gee, there's all that new stuff to deal with. For instance, shall we study and use embryonic stem cells or just continue throwing them out? Shall we believe millions of scientist's research on evolution or rename a 6000 year old story and call it a fact?

Bush even got busted for hiring a hack to edit his reading (such as that must be) and to remove all references to global warming, lest he ever be accused of comprehension.

Imagine spending tax dollars to prevent Bush from learning something. What a waste of money.

You know, you're not stupid if you don't know the facts.

You're ignorant.

So now great minds like Justice Scalia get to rule on the possibility that global warming is an environmental problem and whether or not Bush's evisceration of the EPA was successful.

Amazingly, it's so obvious to the rest of civilization that even the companies that benefit from the creation of these gases admit that there is a problem that they not only have caused, but continue to cause.

Can't wait to hear Scalia and Thomas declare warming a non-environmental issue.

Like Livingston county's boy genius Joe Hune said at the election debate last summer, "Weeellll, that Global warming is big science...big science."

And that's the truth from Livingston County